Who has taken the bait, Tharoor or Congress?

When Prime Minister Modi invited Shashi Tharoor for his dream project Swatch Bharath Abhiyan, many guessed it as bait. When Tharoor accepted the challenge, observers commented that he has taken the bait. The Sunanda Pushkar episode has put him in a great difficulty, and now BJP in power, he has to be extra careful. Even if he is so innocent in the incident, the ruling party with its control over CBI can do a lot of damage to Tharoor’s political career. So, it is quite normal for anybody to assume that Tharoor was trapped by Modi. However, it is clear that Modi is not just aiming Tharoor alone, but the whole Congress itself; see how Congress leadership, especially the KPCC reacted against Tharoor’s praise of Modi. Their image is declined and was criticized for being narrow minded. When the prime minister is taking an initiative to improve the country, why the ‘opposition’ is trying to find only negatives? In other words, by taking disciplinary action against Tharoor, it is the Congress Party which has taken the bait. I would say, even Tharoor scored well in the challenge with his good response.

The Political One-Man Show and Diplomatic Successes

If one tries to judge just a few months old government, it would be erroneous. In the same way, glorifying someone in such a short time also can be considered immature. These two are the observations one can find in newspapers and TV channels regarding the Modi India. However, one thing alone can be said of Modi’s approach: he is doing things in an unprecedented way, beyond the conventional logic and thinking. He has rewritten the concepts concerning foreign policy and administrative method. The way he interacted with students in Japan, the public gathering he organized at New York. We have seen presidents or heads of the states visiting schools and places of popular praises. And they used to meet important business groups, pressure groups and so on. However, it is not so common to meet the common man, a public gathering in a foreign land. It is all good and just OK. There is no denying that the common man was impressed, they got a new deity, a new role model. With his ‘swatch bharath abhiyan’, he again received loud applause.

The one and only difference of opinion I have with both Modi fans and critics is that when we analyze a policy, we should judge not based on popular impressions and media coverage, rather it should be based on the results. Of course, we have got a good response from Japan. But the question is, was that an unprecedented gesture from Japanese side. Didn’t we receive good response and business investments? When a head of a state with a good majority in the parliament visits other countries, they will get a warm welcome. Other than this usual help, can we say Modi’s visit to Japan met all its purposes? Similar is the case with his visit to US. Nothing more happened other than some false promises and some meaningless gestures. In the case with Pakistan, it remains where it started, a deadlock.

The Modi era, if we can call the period in such a way, can do great things to the country if only if we stop the blabbermouth, and concentrate more on action.

(Image courtesy: google.com)

You should know how i feel- An offering of love!

Anu Lal is an emerging Indian English short story writer who made his debut by publishing the short story collection Wall of Colours and Other Stories. With this single work of fiction itself, he has proved himself as a foremost short story writer of the sub-continent. We, readers, have a problem all over the world: we can’t understand anything without categorizing the writing or the writer. We will identify the writings as Indian English, American, Black or Hispanic, and after that we will formulate theories and movements. Thus, we have post-colonial, black aesthetics, and so on. The proponents of this would say that there is nothing as ‘universal human art/ literature’. In other words, the readers can grasp the writing only through classification and categorization. However, here is a writer who discards all such categorizations, any attempt to limit the creative craft. Thus, the stories in the collection Wall of Colours can be consider as ‘universal’.

Anu Lal now comes up with a new collection titled You should know how i feel with another promising writer Dhanya Krishna. After reading it, I pondered over one question: Is Love Universal? The answer depends on how we define ‘love.’ The unique feeling one feels towards someone special is undoubtedly universal, but the situations and circumstances that one encounters while realizing it affect many socio-cultural and psychological conditions. As I mentioned above, Anu Lal’s writings in a way escape most of the theoretical categorizations, but here, if one wants to understand the particular work along such lines, we can have them, because the socio-cultural and psychological levels of the characters and situations can be grasped more fully if we know the cultural scenario of Kerala, especially, the story titled Rukhsana’s Husband. Being a multi-cultural society with many religious groups and religions, the conflicts and confusions between those very groups and the successful resolving are a common thing in Kerala. Here, the conflicts are because of the inter-religious marriage between the lovers, Rukhsana and Peter. In the story Like an Arabian Tale, the political situations can be seen, and political violence is so common in the Malabar Coast of Kerala. In the story I Am You, we can see the cultural conflicts, in which the consent of the family is of great importance in the relationship between the hero and the heroine. The story My World is Called You is about love-after-marriage. Here also, the cultural notions about family playing a crucial role.

The above observations are not for showing that the particular piece of work can be read as a typical Indian English writing; on the contrary, what I want to convey is that, for those who can read a work of fiction only through the socio-cultural scenario, they can read it in the same way, but on the whole, this is nothing but an offering of love, pure love. Analysing the underlying feature of the book, i.e., this offering of love, would kill the beauty of it, so I am not trying that. Read, enjoy, and live the fictional world of love yourself.

A celebrity and a victim of Secular India- Condolences!

How will I remember 20th March 2014? While reading two news reports this evening, I wonder. These two reports have no connection, except that both are about death; one normal, and the other abnormal (yes, abnormal, not the death but the situations that lead to it.)

The prominent Indian English writer Khushwant Singh passed away at the age of 99. Considering the life span of 99 years, I could say he was so fortunate. Though I am a bit of an addict of novels and short stories, I didn’t read Singh much, except a poor translation of Women and Men in my Life (1995). He always shocked the readers with his daring attempt to discuss female sexuality, thus spitting at all the pseudo-moral principles of our country. Besides, he always stood for secular practices in the country.

Mrs. Salomi, wife of Prof. Joseph committed suicide yesterday night, which will remain as a blemish on the face of the much-celebrated ‘secular-progressive’ politics of Kerala. Prof. Joseph was a professor at Newman College, Thodupuzha. During an exam, he prepared a question paper based on the chapter prescribed in the syllabus, without knowing that, this very act will destroy his life and career. Some extremist religious group attacked him and marred his hand alleging that the question paper contained a question which criticizes the Prophet. In order to show the ‘secular’ face of the institution, the college administration fired him from the job and the so-called ‘secular’ political parties supported this. Without having a job and the fear to go outside, the professor and his family lived in terror. Odd to a secular country like India!

Kushwant Singh was an ardent believer of secular practices in India, a celebrity of secularism, whereas Mrs. Salomi was the victim, victim of the hypocritical society of India. Secularism is downgraded as a mere slogan here!

The Game Changer- NOTA or AAP?

In your opinion, what makes this election so curious? Or, is it curious? I find the election extremely curious, I will tell you why. Though I don’t think the rhetoric ‘cast vote, use your right’ worth considering, I think casting vote this year may be is interesting. The major reason for discarding this rhetoric is that we don’t have any right at all as we don’t have much voice in the selection of the candidates or in the decision making process. Election 2014 is curious enough for me because of three reasons:

The presence of AAP
Inclusion of large number of young voters
Introduction of NOTA

Among these I consider NOTA as of extremely curious, but I think the presence of AAP will decrease its relevance. Large sections of our people are against the political situation in our country, but couldn’t express their unhappiness in any other way. However, now, these discontent sections can show their feelings by voting NOTA. The relevance of NOTA is decreased not because these discontent sections are happy now, but they can show their unhappiness by voting AAP. Though this will not put AAP in power, it will have a strong effect in most of the states, especially in urban sections and among educated young Indians. The educated young Indians are not that much politically conscious as most political observers would think; in fact most of them are blindly following, the communal, fascist, feudal politics, but a significant minority among them will think otherwise.
It is not the majority who are turning the wheels of history and bringing about revolutions, but a vigilant minority.